发现

利用人工智能揭示、增强和保护商业机密。

管理

运行商业秘密计划所需的一切。

专业服务

为建立商业秘密计划和保护关键知识产权资产提供专家指导。

常见问题

常见问题答案

博客

洞察和更新行业趋势

新闻

有关 Tangibly 的媒体报道

播客

合理措施播客

网络研讨会

探讨战略见解的演讲

判例法评论

重大商业秘密案件

知识库

发行说明和其他 Tangibly 指南

Case Study

Industry-specific applications

TS25

International Standards for Trade Secret Management

How do Chinese companies protect their own trade secrets?

How do Chinese companies protect their own trade secrets
Last updated on: 2 月 6, 2025
Author: Chris Buntel

This article is part of Tangibly’s Guest Series. Read the original article here.

On this page

There’s a lot of discussion about American companies and citizens risking their trade secrets by using AI based in China. What about Chinese companies? How do they protect their own trade secrets against misappropriation from other Chinese domestic companies seeking to gain an unfair advantage?

As Chinese companies develop their own innovations, they need solid protection from theft too. This has driven an improvement in the Chinese legal system for both domestic and international companies. This same thing happened in the patent system already – pressure from domestic companies led to an improvement in the quality and enforcement of patents.

How do Chinese companies protect their own trade secrets

China does not have a separate trade secret statute (like DTSA in the US), but instead it is part of Article 2 of the “AUCL” – Anti-Unfair Competition Law.

Definitions of trade secrets are remarkably harmonized around the world, unlike patent systems that can vary considerably. China defines them as commercial information unknown to the public that has commercial value and for which its lawful holder has taken proper confidentiality measures. Sounds very similar to DTSA’s three-part definition, doesn’t it? The AUCL even says that trade secrets can include both technical and business information.

The AUCL provides both civil as well as criminal sanctions, again much like DTSA in the US.

There is also increasing litigation in China over trade secret theft, often between two Chinese companies.

Everyone should take steps to maintain the confidentiality of their valuable trade secrets, no matter where they are. This is especially true in today’s politically charged business environment.

Related Articles

Blog, Guest Author Series

The New Face of IP in the AI Age: Why Trade Secrets Matter More Than Ever for Tech [Part 1 of 2]

Imagine this: A consultant starts a competing company after taking your proprietary information while under a confidentiality agreement. You promptly file a trade...
博客

There’s No Trade Secret Troll Hiding Under The Bridge

Imagine this: A consultant starts a competing company after taking your proprietary information while under a confidentiality agreement. You promptly file a trade...
Stealing Confidential Information is Not Necessarily Trade Secret Misappropriation
Blog, Guest Author Series

Stealing Confidential Information is Not Necessarily Trade Secret Misappropriation

Imagine this: A consultant starts a competing company after taking your proprietary information while under a confidentiality agreement. You promptly file a trade...
博客

Caffeinated or Not, Intent Matters: The Real Cost of Trade Secret Theft

Federal DTSA and Massachusetts UTSA do not clearly define what “willful and malicious” means. Recent litigation in Massachusetts took great steps towards clarifying...
博客

KPM Analytics Wins $10M Trade Secret Case: What It Means for Foodtech and IP Protection

A recent federal court ruling awarded over $10 million in damages to KPM Analytics, a scientific instrumentation company serving the food and agriculture sectors, in a...
TS25.org
博客

Introducing Trade Secret 2025 (TS25): The Future of Trade Secret Management

Tangibly, the leading trade secret management platform, proudly announces the launch of Trade Secret 2025 (TS25)—a cutting-edge digital resource designed to...
KPM Analytics v. Blue Sun Scientific
博客

Palantir is Suing a Y Combinator Startup Over Trade Secrets

Palantir has filed a trade secret lawsuit against Guardian AI, a healthcare-focused AI startup launched by two of its former employees, in what is shaping up to be one...
博客

Rippling v. Deel: Outsource your HR, but not your trade secrets.

Rippling sued their arch-competitor Deel in the Northern District Court of California on March 17, 2025. Rippling claims that Deel used a “mole” within Rippling to...
How To Keep AI From Stealing Intellectual Property
博客

How To Keep AI From Stealing Intellectual Property

Artificial intelligence presents both opportunities and risks for businesses. While it drives innovation and efficiency, it also creates vulnerabilities for...
The Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property
博客

The Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property

Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed the way we create, innovate, and safeguard ideas, but it also introduces intricate questions around intellectual property...