Why Trade Secret Protection Is Broken at Many Large Companies

営業秘密保護法(DTSA)に基づく内部告発者免責の理解
Last Updated: 11月 13, 2025
Updated by: Tangibly

Table Of Content

Many large companies are seemingly paralyzed by trade secrets. It is surprising given their resources and sophistication in other areas of IP law.
Large companies usually have large patent and trademark portfolios, teams of legal professionals, and significant IP budgets. They are comfortable with patents and trademarks because processes and systems are well established, supported by law firms and internal counsel.

Trade secrets, however, often remain unmanaged. Large companies find starting the process of identifying trade secrets to be intimidating and are afraid to start. Some cite lack of staffing or budget as barriers although they have plenty for patents and trademarks. This is actually an allocation challenge, not a resource challenge.

Another problem is the reactive mindset. Many large companies wait until there is a trade secret theft to take action. Courts under trade secret law are requiring proactive measures long before theft occurs. Without evidence of reasonable steps, even the strongest claims fail.

Companies that treat trade secret protection as an intellectual venture on par with patent filing or trademark registration are better positioned for compliance and risk mitigation. Tangibly makes that shift possible by offering enterprise tools that scale across departments and geographies.

Why do large companies struggle with trade secret management?

Because trade secrets lack formal registration systems, many enterprises delay creating structured processes. The ambiguity makes teams hesitant to start.

Why do corporations invest heavily in patents but neglect trade secrets?

Patents and trademarks have clear processes, established law firm support, and longstanding internal workflows. Trade secrets are less systematised and feel abstract.

What stops big companies from identifying their trade secrets?

Teams often feel overwhelmed by the scale of information and worry about doing it “wrong.” This leads to paralysis, even though the task is manageable with proper tools.

Why is a reactive approach risky for trade secrets?

Courts require proof of proactive reasonable measures. Waiting until theft occurs usually results in weak cases and failed IP claims.

How can large companies begin managing trade secrets effectively?

By treating trade secrets like any other IP asset: identifying them, documenting them, training staff, and maintaining a register.

How does Tangibly help enterprises overcome trade secret paralysis?

Tangibly provides tools for identifying, documenting, communicating, and managing trade secrets at scale across teams, departments, and countries.

Is trade secret protection harder for global organisations?

It can be, due to distributed teams and inconsistent processes. Enterprise software like Tangibly standardises systems across locations.

from our blog

Blog, AI & IP, Case Law & Industry Trends, Featured Blogs, Guest Author Series

Using AI doesn’t make your law firm AI-native

Recent buzzwords are “AI-native” and especially the “AI-native law firm”, but what do they mean and why are they a big deal in the legal industry? First, let’s exclude...
Blog, Featured Blogs, Guest Author Series, Trade Secret Strategy

Top-10 surprising “business” trade secrets

If the scope of patents is large, the range of trade secrets is enormous! In my mind, the world of trade secrets can be divided into two large buckets: “technical” and...
Blog, Featured Blogs, Guest Author Series, Trade Secret Strategy

The three necessary ingredients to a trade secret

If you read cases and statutes about trade secrets from anywhere in the world, you will see a three-part definition is used.  Trade secret law is remarkably harmonized,...
Blog, Case Law & Industry Trends, Trade Secret Strategy

HouseCanary Wins Big, Loses Bigger, and Still Walks Away With a Massive Trade Secret Verdict

This Texas trade secret verdict is a good reminder that even when a plaintiff wins big, trade secret litigation can still turn on procedural issues at the very end....
Blog, Featured Blogs

Tangibly Achieves SOC 2 Compliance, Reinforcing Our Commitment to Security and Trade Secret Protection

We are proud to share that Tangibly has successfully completed its SOC 2 audit again this year, marking an important milestone in our continued commitment to enterprise...
Blog, Case Law & Industry Trends, Trade Secret Strategy

What’s happening in the Epic Games trade secret lawsuit over Fortnite leaks?

Another Epic lawsuit! This case is another great, Epic even, example of how 70% of trade secret problems come from insider leaks like employee or contractor misconduct....
Blog, AI & IP, Intellectual Property & Patent Insights, Trade Secret Strategy

What is litigation funding?

With the recent press release from SIM IP and Tangibly, a client recently asked me a simple but important question: how does litigation funding actually work? The...
Blog, Featured Blogs, Guest Author Series, Press, Trade Secret Strategy

SIM IP and Tangibly Launch Trade Secret Litigation Financing Partnership

Miami – Jan 15, 2026 – Sauvegarder Investment Management, Inc. (“SIM IP”), a global leader in intellectual property-based investment and monetization, and Tangibly, an...
Blog, Trade Secret Strategy

How do litigation funding companies evaluate trade secret claims?

Trade secret misappropriation cases can produce substantial recoveries, but they are complex, expensive, and inherently risky. For companies confronting stolen trade...
Blog, Trade Secret Strategy

The financial impact of trade secret misappropriation

Trade secret misappropriation is not merely a legal dispute. It is a direct assault on enterprise value. When confidential business information is taken, misused, or...