Is the federal DTSA grass always greener? Sometimes yes! Most people think that federal actions under DTSA are basically the same as state actions under UTSA, but that’s an oversimplification. Sure, DTSA was based on UTSA, but occasionally we are reminded that there...
Featured Articles
Guarding the Edge: Why Trade Secret Protection Matters in the New NIL Era
Executive Summary The landscape of college athletics is undergoing a profound transformation. With the recent House v. NCAA settlement and the continued prominence of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals, athletic departments are no longer just sports programs; they...
Caffeinated or Not, Intent Matters: The Real Cost of Trade Secret Theft
Federal DTSA and Massachusetts UTSA do not clearly define what “willful and malicious” means. Recent litigation in Massachusetts took great steps towards clarifying this issue. KPM Analtics North America sued Blue Sun Scientific, Innovative Technologies Group, and four former employees for trade secret misappropriation under both DTSA and MUTSA.
KPM Analytics Wins $10M Trade Secret Case: What It Means for Foodtech and IP Protection
A recent federal court ruling awarded over $10 million in damages to KPM Analytics, a scientific instrumentation company serving the food and agriculture sectors, in a landmark trade secret misappropriation case. The verdict reinforces the value of protecting intellectual property in industries where technical innovation moves fast and competitive advantages can be lost overnight.
Palantir is Suing a Y Combinator Startup Over Trade Secrets
Palantir has filed a trade secret lawsuit against Guardian AI, a healthcare-focused AI startup launched by two of its former employees, in what is shaping up to be one of the most high profile IP disputes of 2025. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and alleges brazen theft of trade secrets used to build and launch Guardian AI while the founders were still employed at Palantir.
Rippling v. Deel: Outsource your HR, but not your trade secrets.
Rippling sued their arch-competitor Deel in the Northern District Court of California on March 17, 2025. Rippling claims that Deel used a “mole” within Rippling to obtain valuable confidential information.
Heraeus Kulzer, GmbH 対 Biomet, Inc.
この事件は、国境を越えた営業秘密訴訟の複雑さを浮き彫りにしている。
1782条訴訟を戦略的に利用することで、対外的なディスカバリーを得ることができる。
また、外国の判決を執行し、貿易を保護する上での課題もある。
複数の司法管轄区にまたがる秘密
Organik Kimya, San.AS v. ITC, 2017
このケースは、証拠隠滅がもたらす深刻な結果を強調し、次のことを肯定している。
企業秘密保護と特許法を執行するITCの権限は、ITCにある。
国際貿易の場である。
スピア・マーケティング対バンコープ・サウス銀行事件
この事件は、営業秘密訴訟における著作権先取りの複雑さを浮き彫りにしている。
そして、このような訴訟で勝訴した当事者に大きな経済的影響があることを強調している。
を争う。
ヴェロニカ・フーズ・カンパニー対エクリン
このケースは、機密保持を明確に定めることの重要性を強調している。
営業秘密の保護を主張するための情報の独占的知識と課題
過去に開示された情報が関係する場合、原告は直面する。
アルタ・デバイス社対LGエレクトロニクス社。
Alta Devices, Inc., initiated a lawsuit against LG Electronics, Inc., alleging misappropriation of trade secret technology relating to thin-film Gallium Arsenide (GaAs) solar cells. Alta claimed that confidential and proprietary information was disclosed to LG under a...
INDAG GmbH & CO.BETREIBS KG 対 IMA SPA
This case involves allegations of patent infringement and trade secret misappropriation between a former employee, the employer, and the new employer. Plaintiffs, INDAG GmbH & Co. Betreibs KG and Wild Parma S.r.L, allege that defendants infringed U.S. Patent No....
TEXAS ADVANCED OPTOELECTRONIC SOLUTIONS, INC. ルネサス エレクトロニクス アメリカ
This case involved a dispute between Texas Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions, Inc. (TAOS) and Intersil Corporation (now Renesas Electronics America, Inc.) over the alleged misappropriation of trade secrets related to ambient light sensor technology. During 2004...
ウェルズ・ファーゴ・インサービシズ・USA社対マクウェート社
The case involves allegations by Plaintiff Wells Fargo against former employees (Defendants) who left to work for a competitor, whereby engaging in wrongful conduct harming Wells Fargo. The court granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ Motion for Summary...
ジャズ・ファーマシューティカルズ対シンクロニー・グループLLC他。
In this 2018 case, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. sued Synchrony Group, LLC, and its related entities for violations of the DTSA, PUTSA, breach of contract, breach of duty of loyalty, and breach of fiduciary duty. The dispute emerged after Synchrony, contracted under a...
ビアンコ対GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.
In a dispute over trade secret misappropriation, Dr. Sabatino Bianco sued Globus Medical, Inc., alleging the company used his trade secret for a spinal surgery device without permission. After a jury verdict in Bianco's favor, awarding damages and ongoing royalties...