Palantir is Suing a Y Combinator Startup Over Trade Secrets

Last updated on: April 3, 2025
By: Tangibly

On this page

Palantir sues ex-employees turned founders of Guardian AI for allegedly stealing trade secrets to launch a competing startup.

Palantir v. Guardian AI Explained

Palantir has filed a trade secret lawsuit against Guardian AI, a healthcare-focused AI startup launched by two of its former employees, in what is shaping up to be one of the most high profile IP disputes of 2025. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and alleges brazen theft of trade secrets used to build and launch Guardian AI while the founders were still employed at Palantir.

The lawsuit targets Guardian AI founders Mayank Jain and Pranav Pillai, both of whom worked in Palantir’s healthcare division between 2022 and 2024. According to the complaint, the two allegedly took proprietary knowledge developed at Palantir, applied to Y Combinator’s Summer 2024 batch, and launched Guardian AI shortly after leaving the company.

Palantir claims that Guardian AI’s platform, which helps healthcare providers fight insurance claim denials using AI, was built directly on top of Palantir’s own healthcare denial management tools. These tools were described in the filing as AI and data driven software that helps healthcare providers get paid for the services they provide.

The lawsuit outlines how Jain and Pillai allegedly secured $500,000 in startup funding and publicly claimed to have saved customers over $150,000 just weeks after leaving Palantir. There is no mistaking Defendants’ work for anything but a ripoff of Palantir, the suit states.

Palantir is seeking treble damages and attorney’s fees and says it plans to pursue arbitration to claw back compensation paid to the employees while they were allegedly developing a competing platform.

This is one of the first major trade secret cases involving a Y Combinator backed company in 2025 and it underscores how AI innovation, IP ownership, and employee mobility continue to collide in high stakes legal battles.

How to Start Protecting Your Trade Secrets

Lessons from Palantir v. Guardian AI

This case is a reminder that valuable ideas can walk out the door if they are not properly protected. Here are a few simple steps companies can take right now to reduce risk:

Protecting Trade Secrets

  1. Know what is valuable: Identify the information that gives your business a competitive edge. This can include code, models, internal processes, or product plans.
  2. Control access: Make sure only the right people can see or use sensitive information. Use permissions, encryption, and access logs.
  3. Track your assets: Keep a record of when key documents or tools were created and who worked on them. This makes it easier to prove ownership if needed.
  4. Mark confidential work: Add labels to important documents and files to make it clear they are protected.
  5. Scan the market: Monitor launches and public materials for signs your proprietary work is being reused.

Where Tangibly Fits In

Tangibly’s platform gives companies a clear way to manage and protect their trade secrets. We help legal and product teams identify what matters, control access, and track ownership across their most sensitive business and technical assets.

From internal workflows to customer data to product code, our system keeps everything organized, labeled, and documented so you can move fast without exposing your IP. Under the hood, Tangibly uses AI to surface hidden risks, connect the dots between assets, and flag weak points in your protection strategy before they become legal issues.

Ready to protect your IP before it walks out the door? Meet with a Tangibly IP Expert today.

Related Articles

Blog

Guarding the Edge: Why Trade Secret Protection Matters in the New NIL Era

Executive Summary The landscape of college athletics is undergoing a profound transformation. With the recent House v. NCAA settlement and the continued prominence of...
Blog

AI is eating your IP

Original Article in IAM Saturday Opinion on June 14, 2025: “AI Is Eating Your IP” Precis: Saturday Opinion: With the aid of Gemini, Tangibly’s Chris Buntel and Tim...
Blog, Guest Author Series

Behind The Curtain: Trade Secret Protection and Theft In Sports

Summary While everyone focuses on the action on the field, the data that makes this action possible is often overlooked. As this data becomes more valuable, it has also...
Blog

Is AI the ultimate defensive publication author?

Defensive publication is a patent strategy that makes it difficult or impossible for competitors to patent on or near what a company is commercializing.  The basic idea...
Blog

Takeaways: AI is Eating Your Intellectual Property (IP)

Overview In the latest IAM Saturday Opinion, Tangibly’s Chris Buntel and Tim Londergan explore how artificial intelligence is transforming the foundation of...
Blog, Guest Author Series

The New Face of IP in the AI Age: Why Trade Secrets Matter More Than Ever for Tech [Part 1 of 2]

Imagine this: A consultant starts a competing company after taking your proprietary information while under a confidentiality agreement. You promptly file a trade...
Blog

There’s No Trade Secret Troll Hiding Under The Bridge

Imagine this: A consultant starts a competing company after taking your proprietary information while under a confidentiality agreement. You promptly file a trade...
Stealing Confidential Information is Not Necessarily Trade Secret Misappropriation
Blog, Guest Author Series

Stealing Confidential Information is Not Necessarily Trade Secret Misappropriation

Imagine this: A consultant starts a competing company after taking your proprietary information while under a confidentiality agreement. You promptly file a trade...
Blog

Caffeinated or Not, Intent Matters: The Real Cost of Trade Secret Theft

Federal DTSA and Massachusetts UTSA do not clearly define what “willful and malicious” means. Recent litigation in Massachusetts took great steps towards clarifying...
Blog

KPM Analytics Wins $10M Trade Secret Case: What It Means for Foodtech and IP Protection

A recent federal court ruling awarded over $10 million in damages to KPM Analytics, a scientific instrumentation company serving the food and agriculture sectors, in a...