Disputes

Proactive Protection

Insights

About

Contact

Disputes

Case Validation
AI intelligence to assess case strength and likely outcome.

Damages prediction
Quantify potential damages with evidence backed estimates.

Litigation Funding
Non recourse capital to pursue strong trade secret claims.

Enforce your rights
When theft occurs, Tangibly delivers the proof, funding, and expertise to recover what is yours.

Insights

Reasonable Measures Podcast
Expert conversations on trade secrets, IP strategy, and the disputes shaping modern innovation.

Customer Stories
How companies use Tangibly to protect critical know how and pursue enforcement.

Sign up for The Tangibly Brief
Expert insights on trade secret protection and enforcement, delivered to your inbox.

About

Company
About Tangibly, our leadership, and career opportunities.

Newsroom
Press, announcements, and company updates.

Sim IP x Tangibly Litigation Financing Partnership
Learn more about how Tangibly and SIM IP are making trade secret enforcement more accessible for innovators.

Another Strike Against Non-Compete Clauses

by Chris Buntel | Jun 12, 2023 | AI & IP, Blog

Another strike against non-compete clauses, this time from Georgia. AmSpec sued four ex-employees for violating their employment agreements once they went to work for competing company Camin. Interestingly, AmSpec did not allege that Camin received or used confidential information.

The court found that the employment agreements were drafted too broadly, and would prevent employment in any capacity at a competing company (Defendants argued it would even prevent employment as a secretary or janitor). The Georgia Restrictive Covenant Act says that non-competition clauses are enforceable, but only “so long as the restrictions are reasonable in time, geographic area, and scope of prohibited activities”.

The clause in the employment agreement was unreasonable as written, and therefore is unenforceable.

A trade secret misappropriation complaint, if AmSpec had good evidence/contracts/basis, would have been interesting.


Source:

https://scholar.google.com.my/scholar_case?case=4016182781230288339&q=Amspec,+LLC+v.+Calhoun&hl=en&as_sdt=2006&as_vis=1

Last Updated:June, 2026

Table Of Content

Sign up for The Tangibly Brief

Expert insights on trade secret protection and enforcement, delivered to your inbox.