Trade Secrets – A Borderless Asset Contributing to Global Economic Growth and Development

Understanding Whistleblower Immunity Under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA)
Last Updated: December 28, 2022
Updated by: Tangibly

Table Of Content

As major portions of the global population continue to transition to digital technologies, enterprises are increasingly at risk that their trade secret assets can be hacked, downloaded or otherwise electronically transferred across international boundaries. While there is no universal legally binding definition of a tradesecret, given the substantial economic value that trade secrets represent in the global economy, a general consensus has developed among major economic regions regarding the basics of trade secret law, including what constitutes a trade secret and misappropriation.

For instance, the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), which was signed into law in 2016, provides a Federal private right of action for trade secret misappropriation and effectively harmonizes provisional and permanent remedies (that is, injunctive relief, damages and, in certain instances, criminal liability) among the 50 states. That same year, the European Parliament signed into law the Directive on the Protection of Undisclosed Know How and Business Information (Trade Secrets) Against their Unlawful Acquisition, Use and Disclosure (Directive). Like the DTSA, the Directive sought to harmonize trade secret laws, including available remedies, among the EU member states. Since 2019, new trade secret laws are in effect throughout the EU.

Effects of the macroeconomic disruptions associated with the COVID pandemic, including broken cross-border supply chains, remote working and enabling technologies, disaffection among employees, and the Great Resignation have all stressed an enterprise’s ability to effectively manage its trade secrets. This in turn is resulting in increased attention paid to trade secrets by their owners, investors, outside counsel, and law enforcement. With this increased attention has come an explosion of cases, both domestically and internationally, as well as a plethora of multiday conferences devoted to trade secrets, including trending cross-border issues,such as the USPTO Trade Secrets Symposium 2022; The 2022 Sedona Conference of Trade Secrets; Trade Secret IP Protection & Management EU Summit 2022; 2022 WIPO Symposium on Trade Secrets and Innovation; International Bar Association 2022 Conference on the Protection of Trade Secrets in Cross-Border and Remote Work Setting by Multi-National Corporations, and the2022 IPBC Asia Looking Beyond Patents conference.

Both the DTSA and the Directive have begun to effectively harmonize expected outcomes of trade secret litigation across jurisdictions, where previously there was much inconsistency and unpredictability. While there are, and will continue to be, important differences between the DTSA and the Directive (for example, statute of limitations) there is significant definitional and remedial overlap. Even China’s 2019 amendment of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law (AUCL), which expanded the legal protection for trade secrets, has language similar to the DTSA and Directive. For trade secret misappropriation matters in the US, given the choice, DTSA and the federal courts will likely remain the forum of choice given their relatively expansive jurisdictional reach. Federal courts have jurisdiction over any conduct, even conduct occurring in a foreign jurisdiction, if the alleged misappropriator is a US citizen or entity or “an act in furtherance of the offense” occurred in the US – and broad discovery rules. The International Trade Commission (ITC) is also becoming an attractive venue to block the import of products made with or incorporating misappropriated trade secrets.

Trade secrets are seeing increasing interest and activity internationally as well. For example, DOW Chemical was successful in enforcing a Swedish trade secret arbitration award against a Chinese chemical company. Also, the recent ITC case of LG v SK involved a Korean company enforcing in the United States a misappropriation claim related to its Korean invented and housed trade secrets against another competing Korean company.

Once viewed as the poor stepchild of government policies encouraging the use of Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights to protect valuable innovations, trade secrets are coming into theirown, and governments are now beginning to protect trade secrets regardless of borders. As a result, our Tangibly platform has been developed to help our customers manage their trade secret assets to a new global standard.

from our blog

Blog, Featured Blogs

Tangibly Achieves SOC 2 Compliance, Reinforcing Our Commitment to Security and Trade Secret Protection

We are proud to share that Tangibly has successfully completed its SOC 2 audit again this year, marking an important milestone in our continued commitment to enterprise...
Blog, Case Law & Industry Trends, Trade Secret Strategy

What’s happening in the Epic Games trade secret lawsuit over Fortnite leaks?

Another Epic lawsuit! This case is another great, Epic even, example of how 70% of trade secret problems come from insider leaks like employee or contractor misconduct....
Blog, AI & IP, Intellectual Property & Patent Insights, Trade Secret Strategy

What is litigation funding?

With the recent press release from SIM IP and Tangibly, a client recently asked me a simple but important question: how does litigation funding actually work? The...
Blog, Featured Blogs, Guest Author Series, Press, Trade Secret Strategy

SIM IP and Tangibly Launch Trade Secret Litigation Financing Partnership

Miami – Jan 15, 2026 – Sauvegarder Investment Management, Inc. (“SIM IP”), a global leader in intellectual property-based investment and monetization, and Tangibly, an...
Blog, Trade Secret Strategy

How do litigation funding companies evaluate trade secret claims?

Trade secret misappropriation cases can produce substantial recoveries, but they are complex, expensive, and inherently risky. For companies confronting stolen trade...
Blog, Trade Secret Strategy

The financial impact of trade secret misappropriation

Trade secret misappropriation is not merely a legal dispute. It is a direct assault on enterprise value. When confidential business information is taken, misused, or...
Blog, Trade Secret Strategy

What to do after discovering trade secret misappropriation or IP theft

Discovering that trade secrets or other confidential information have been stolen, whether by an employee, competitor, or third party, poses a serious threat to your...
Blog, Trade Secret Strategy

When to use litigation funding in a trade secret lawsuit?

Trade secret lawsuits arise from intellectual property theft or the misappropriation of confidential business information. These disputes can deliver substantial...
Blog, AI & IP, Featured Blogs, Intellectual Property & Patent Insights, Trade Secret Strategy

When AI patent tools become the most valuable trade secrets

A newly filed lawsuit in the Northern District of California centers on alleged trade secret misappropriation involving an AI powered patent analysis and management...
Blog, Trade Secret Strategy

What are litigation loans and how do they work in high value disputes?

The term “litigation loans” is commonly used by companies searching for capital to pursue a lawsuit. In practice, most sophisticated commercial funding structures are...