Disputes

Proactive Protection

Insights

About

Contact

Disputes

Case Validation
AI intelligence to assess case strength and likely outcome.

Damages prediction
Quantify potential damages with evidence backed estimates.

Litigation Funding
Non recourse capital to pursue strong trade secret claims.

Enforce your rights
When theft occurs, Tangibly delivers the proof, funding, and expertise to recover what is yours.

Insights

Reasonable Measures Podcast
Expert conversations on trade secrets, IP strategy, and the disputes shaping modern innovation.

Customer Stories
How companies use Tangibly to protect critical know how and pursue enforcement.

Sign up for The Tangibly Brief
Expert insights on trade secret protection and enforcement, delivered to your inbox.

About

Company
About Tangibly, our leadership, and career opportunities.

Newsroom
Press, announcements, and company updates.

Sim IP x Tangibly Litigation Financing Partnership
Learn more about how Tangibly and SIM IP are making trade secret enforcement more accessible for innovators.

GE Betz, Inc. v. Moffitt-Johnston, 2018

by Tangibly | Jun 13, 2024 | Case Law & Industry Trends, Case Law Reviews, Chemicals

In the 2018 case of GE Betz, Inc. v. Moffitt-Johnston, the
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dealt with
allegations from GE Betz, Inc. against Michelle Moffitt-Johnston
and AmSpec Services, L.L.C. for breaching a non-solicitation
agreement, misappropriating trade secrets, and tortiously
interfering with prospective business relationships. The district
court partially granted summary judgment in favor of the
defendants, particularly dismissing the trade secret
misappropriation claim due to speculative evidence. The
appellate court affirmed this decision in part but vacated the
award of $217,189 in attorney’s fees to Moffitt-Johnston,
finding insufficient evidence of breach of the non-solicitation
agreement or trade secret misappropriation. This case
underscores the importance of concrete evidence in claims of
trade secret misappropriation and contractual breaches. The
decision is an appeal from the district court for the Southern
District of Texas.

Last Updated:May, 2026

Table Of Content

Sign up for The Tangibly Brief

Expert insights on trade secret protection and enforcement, delivered to your inbox.