Many large companies are seemingly paralyzed by trade secrets. It is surprising given their resources and sophistication in other areas of IP law.Large companies usually have large patent and trademark portfolios, teams of legal professionals, and significant IP...
Featured Articles
Amazon Faces Trade Secret Lawsuit from Regional Air Freight Startup TuffAir
In July 2025, Ohio-based air freight startup TuffAir filed a trade lawsuit against Amazon for misappropriation of trade secrets under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA). The case raises key questions about how startups can protect confidential business information...
Quintara Biosciences v. Ruifeng: Is the federal DTSA grass always greener?
Is the federal DTSA grass always greener? Sometimes yes! Most people think that federal actions under DTSA are basically the same as state actions under UTSA, but that’s an oversimplification. Sure, DTSA was based on UTSA, but occasionally we are reminded that there...
Guarding the Edge: Why Trade Secret Protection Matters in the New NIL Era
Executive Summary The landscape of college athletics is undergoing a profound transformation. With the recent House v. NCAA settlement and the continued prominence of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals, athletic departments are no longer just sports programs; they...
Caffeinated or Not, Intent Matters: The Real Cost of Trade Secret Theft
Federal DTSA and Massachusetts UTSA do not clearly define what “willful and malicious” means. Recent litigation in Massachusetts took great steps towards clarifying this issue. KPM Analtics North America sued Blue Sun Scientific, Innovative Technologies Group, and four former employees for trade secret misappropriation under both DTSA and MUTSA.
KPM Analytics Wins $10M Trade Secret Case: What It Means for Foodtech and IP Protection
A recent federal court ruling awarded over $10 million in damages to KPM Analytics, a scientific instrumentation company serving the food and agriculture sectors, in a landmark trade secret misappropriation case. The verdict reinforces the value of protecting intellectual property in industries where technical innovation moves fast and competitive advantages can be lost overnight.
ChromaDex, Inc. v. Elysium Health, Inc.
The case is significant for its interpretation of the economic loss rule, requirements for
alleging fraudulent deceit and misappropriation of trade secrets, and the application of
patent misuse as a defense in contract disputes.
Veronica Foods Company v. Ecklin
The case underscores the importance of clearly establishing the confidentiality and
exclusive knowledge of information to claim trade secret protection and the challenges
plaintiffs face when previously disclosed information is involved.
Spear Marketing, Inc. v. BancorpSouth Bank
This case highlights the complexities of copyright preemption in trade secret litigation
and underscores the significant financial implications for parties prevailing in such
disputes.
Organik Kimya, San. ve Tic. AS v. ITC, 2017
This case underscores the severe consequences of spoliation of evidence and affirms
the ITC’s authority to enforce trade secret protections and patent laws within the
international trade arena.
Heraeus Kulzer, GmbH v. Biomet, Inc., et al.
This case underscores the complexities of cross-border trade secret litigation, the
strategic use of § 1782 actions for obtaining discovery in support of foreign
proceedings, and the challenges in enforcing foreign judgments and protecting trade
secrets across multiple jurisdictions.
GE Betz, Inc. v. Moffitt-Johnston, 2018
This case highlights the challenges in enforcing non-solicitation agreements and
protecting trade secrets within the industry, emphasizing the need for clear, concrete
evidence to support claims.
Bianco v. GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.
In a dispute over trade secret misappropriation, Dr. Sabatino Bianco sued Globus Medical, Inc., alleging the company used his trade secret for a spinal surgery device without permission. After a jury verdict in Bianco's favor, awarding damages and ongoing royalties...
ALLIANTGROUP, LP v. Mols, 2017
This case underscores the enforceability of forum selection clauses in employment
contracts and highlights the legal boundaries of noncompetition and nondisclosure
agreements.
Baker Hughes Inc. v. S&S CHEMICAL, LLC, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
This case underscores the importance of clear contractual terms and the binding
nature of agreements even when not signed by all parties, provided there is mutual
performance. It illustrates how settlements from unrelated disputes can have broad
implications.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Synchrony Group, LLC, et al.
In this 2018 case, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. sued Synchrony Group, LLC, and its related entities for violations of the DTSA, PUTSA, breach of contract, breach of duty of loyalty, and breach of fiduciary duty. The dispute emerged after Synchrony, contracted under a...
