Disputes

Proactive Protection

Insights

About

Contact

Disputes

Case Validation
AI intelligence to assess case strength and likely outcome.

Damages prediction
Quantify potential damages with evidence backed estimates.

Litigation Funding
Non recourse capital to pursue strong trade secret claims.

Enforce your rights
When theft occurs, Tangibly delivers the proof, funding, and expertise to recover what is yours.

Insights

Reasonable Measures Podcast
Expert conversations on trade secrets, IP strategy, and the disputes shaping modern innovation.

Customer Stories
How companies use Tangibly to protect critical know how and pursue enforcement.

Sign up for The Tangibly Brief
Expert insights on trade secret protection and enforcement, delivered to your inbox.

About

Company
About Tangibly, our leadership, and career opportunities.

Newsroom
Press, announcements, and company updates.

Sim IP x Tangibly Litigation Financing Partnership
Learn more about how Tangibly and SIM IP are making trade secret enforcement more accessible for innovators.

INDAG GmbH & CO. BETREIBS KG v. IMA SPA

by Tangibly | Jun 13, 2024 | Case Law & Industry Trends, Case Law Reviews, Semiconductors

This case involves allegations of patent infringement and trade
secret misappropriation between a former employee, the
employer, and the new employer. Plaintiffs, INDAG GmbH & Co.
Betreibs KG and Wild Parma S.r.L, allege that defendants
infringed U.S. Patent No. 7,648,017 and violated the Illinois
Trade Secrets Act by offering for sale pouch filling machinery in
the United States derived from plaintiffs’ confidential and
proprietary information. The court granted defendants’ motion
to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction over non-resident
defendants and failure to state a claim for patent infringement.
Plaintiffs’ request for jurisdictional discovery was denied.

Last Updated:May, 2026

Table Of Content

Sign up for The Tangibly Brief

Expert insights on trade secret protection and enforcement, delivered to your inbox.