Discover

Leverage AI to reveal, enhance, and protect trade secrets.

Manage

Everything you need to run a trade secret program.

Professional Services

Expert guidance to build a trade secret program and secure key IP assets.

FAQs

Answers to your common questions

Blog

Insights and updates on industry trends

Press

Media coverage featuring Tangibly

Podcast

The Reasonable Measures Podcast

Webinars

Presentations exploring strategic insights

Case Law Reviews

Significant trade secret cases

Knowledge Base

Release notes and other Tangibly guides

Case Study

Industry-specific applications

TS25

International Standards for Trade Secret Management

Veronica Foods Company v. Ecklin

Last updated on: June 13, 2024
Author: Tangibly

This article is part of Tangibly’s Guest Series. Read the original article here.

On this page

In the 2017 case of Veronica Foods Company v. Ecklin,
presided over by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero in the
Northern District of California, Veronica Foods Company
accused Kurt Ecklin and Millpress Imports LLC of
misappropriating trade secrets in violation of the DTSA and
CUTSA. The court dismissed the plaintiff’s first amended
complaint for failing to state a valid claim under both acts, due
to insufficient evidence of misappropriation and public
disclosure of the alleged trade secrets. The decision
emphasized the importance of demonstrating the confidentiality
and exclusive knowledge of information to claim trade secret
protection. The case highlights the challenges in trade secret
litigation, especially when the information is publicly disclosed.
Veronica Foods was given the opportunity to amend its
complaint, underscoring the procedural and substantive
thresholds for pursuing trade secret litigation.

Related Articles

Case Law Reviews, Chemicals

ChromaDex, Inc. v. Elysium Health, Inc.

The case is significant for its interpretation of the economic loss rule, requirements for alleging fraudulent deceit and misappropriation of trade secrets, and the...
Case Law Reviews, Chemicals

GE Betz, Inc. v. Moffitt-Johnston, 2018

This case highlights the challenges in enforcing non-solicitation agreements and protecting trade secrets within the industry, emphasizing the need for clear, concrete...
Case Law Reviews, Chemicals

Heraeus Kulzer, GmbH v. Biomet, Inc., et al.

This case underscores the complexities of cross-border trade secret litigation, the strategic use of § 1782 actions for obtaining discovery in support of foreign...
Case Law Reviews, Chemicals

Organik Kimya, San. ve Tic. AS v. ITC, 2017

This case underscores the severe consequences of spoliation of evidence and affirms the ITC’s authority to enforce trade secret protections and patent laws within...
Case Law Reviews, Chemicals

Spear Marketing, Inc. v. BancorpSouth Bank

This case highlights the complexities of copyright preemption in trade secret litigation and underscores the significant financial implications for parties prevailing...
Case Law Reviews, Chemicals

ALLIANTGROUP, LP v. Mols, 2017

This case underscores the enforceability of forum selection clauses in employment contracts and highlights the legal boundaries of noncompetition and nondisclosure...
Case Law Reviews, Chemicals

Baker Hughes Inc. v. S&S CHEMICAL, LLC, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

This case underscores the importance of clear contractual terms and the binding nature of agreements even when not signed by all parties, provided there is mutual...
Case Law Reviews, Semiconductors

Alta Devices, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.

Alta Devices, Inc., initiated a lawsuit against LG Electronics, Inc., alleging misappropriation of trade secret technology relating to thin-film Gallium Arsenide (GaAs)...
Case Law Reviews, Semiconductors

INDAG GmbH & CO. BETREIBS KG v. IMA SPA

This case involves allegations of patent infringement and trade secret misappropriation between a former employee, the employer, and the new employer. Plaintiffs, INDAG...
Case Law Reviews, Semiconductors

TEXAS ADVANCED OPTOELECTRONIC SOLUTIONS, INC. v. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC

This case involved a dispute between Texas Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions, Inc. (TAOS) and Intersil Corporation (now Renesas Electronics America, Inc.) over the...