Trade Secret Governance

Manage

Everything you need to run a trade secret program.

Discover

Leverage AI to reveal, enhance, and protect trade secrets.

Patent Intelligence Reports

Continuation Analysis

Proposed continuation claims and parent comparisons with trade secret analysis.

Provisional Analysis

Strategies for editing provisional claims, paired with trade secret analysis.

Trade Secret Governance

Professional Services

Expert guidance to build a trade secret program and secure key IP assets.

Patent X-Ray™

Identify trade secrets in your patent. Learn more.


FAQs

Answers to your common questions

Blog

Insights and updates on industry trends

Press

Media coverage featuring Tangibly

Podcast

The Reasonable Measures Podcast

Webinars

Presentations exploring strategic insights

Case Law Reviews

Significant trade secret cases

Knowledge Base

Release notes and other Tangibly guides

Case Study

Industry-specific applications

TS25

International Standards for Trade Secret Management

Guarding the Edge: Why Trade Secret Protection Matters in the New NIL Era

Last updated on: July 23, 2025
By: Raul Sheen

On this page

Executive Summary

The landscape of college athletics is undergoing a profound transformation. With the recent House v. NCAA settlement and the continued prominence of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals, athletic departments are no longer just sports programs; they are sophisticated business entities operating in a high-stakes, competitive environment. Critical assets, such as recruiting strategies, intricate NIL contract structures, detailed donor playbooks, and proprietary performance analytics, previously considered internal operational documents, are rapidly evolving into highly valuable, protectable intellectual property. As these programs mature into more complex and competitive enterprises, safeguarding their informational advantage is no longer a mere option but a fundamental strategic imperative.

The House v. NCAA settlement marks a significant turning point, extending beyond a mere legal milestone to fundamentally reshape collegiate sports. The impending reality of college athletes receiving a share of revenue introduces unprecedented business dynamics for every athletic department nationwide. As the financial stakes escalate, so too does the inherent value of proprietary strategies and information. This includes:

Contract structures for revenue sharing: The specific financial models and contractual language developed to distribute revenue among athletes.

NIL negotiation frameworks: Proprietary approaches, valuation methodologies, and preferred terms used in negotiating NIL deals with athletes and external partners.

Recruiting databases and scouting models: Comprehensive data sets on prospective athletes, including analytical models used for evaluation and targeting.

Donor engagement plans: Detailed strategies for cultivating relationships with donors, including specific outreach methods, gift asks, and stewardship protocols.

Performance science and health data protocols: Advanced methodologies for optimizing athlete performance, injury prevention, and recovery, often involving sensitive personal health information.

Under state and federal law, these types of information can be legally classified as trade secrets if they meet specific criteria. Generally, for information to qualify as a trade secret, it must derive independent economic value from not being generally known or readily ascertainable by others who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use, and it must be subject to reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy. Without robust protection, these valuable assets are highly vulnerable to misappropriation, whether through inadvertent disclosure, unauthorized access, or outright theft by competitors.

Clemson University’s proactive decision to classify its revenue-sharing contracts as trade secrets underscores the seriousness with which some institutions are approaching this paradigm shift. This strategic move highlights an understanding of the legal avenues available to protect proprietary information. Other athletic departments must swiftly adopt similar protective measures or face the significant risks of competitive disadvantage and legal exposure.

The Risks of Trade Secret Misappropriation

In this evolving environment, the movement of personnel—be it athletes, coaches, administrative staff, consultants, or NIL partners – across different programs presents substantial legal and operational risks.

When an individual departs from a program, they don’t merely take their experience; they often carry with them critical insights into confidential strategies, negotiation tactics, and other proprietary information. This knowledge, if unprotected, could provide a rival institution with an unfair competitive advantage. Without clear policies, comprehensive documentation of what constitutes a trade secret, and robust internal controls, establishing legal ownership over such valuable intellectual capital becomes exceedingly difficult.

The misappropriation of trade secrets is no longer solely a corporate concern. Under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), adopted by most U.S. states, and the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), remedies for trade secret theft can include injunctions to prevent further use or disclosure, damages for actual loss, unjust enrichment, and in some cases, exemplary damages and attorney’s fees. These legal frameworks provide powerful tools for protection, but their effectiveness hinges on the plaintiff’s ability to demonstrate that reasonable measures were taken to protect the secrecy of the information. For college athletics, this means that the proactive identification and protection of trade secrets are now becoming a pressing legal concern that warrants immediate attention.

Proactive Measures for Athletic Departments

To mitigate these risks and legally protect their valuable information, athletic departments should undertake several critical steps:

Identify Their Trade Secrets: The foundational step is to conduct a thorough audit to precisely define and catalog all proprietary information within the department. This includes confidential contracts, unique operational systems, specialized analytical tools, and invaluable institutional knowledge. This identification process is crucial for establishing the legal parameters of what constitutes a “trade secret.”

Educate Staff and Stakeholders on Legal Obligations: Comprehensive education is vital. Every individual with access to sensitive information – from athletic directors and recruiting analysts to NIL consultants and student-athletes themselves – must understand what constitutes a trade secret, its legal significance, and their specific responsibilities in maintaining its confidentiality. This includes training on non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and confidentiality clauses in contracts.

Implement a Robust Trade Secret Management Process: Effective trade secret protection goes beyond simply locking away files. It necessitates the establishment of an ongoing, systematic process. This includes:

Access Control: Limiting access to sensitive information on a “need-to-know” basis.

Documentation: Meticulously documenting when, how, and by whom sensitive information is accessed, used, and shared.

Valuation: Regularly assessing the economic value of identified trade secrets to underscore their importance.

Incident Response: Developing clear protocols for responding to suspected or actual breaches of confidentiality or misappropriation incidents.

Contractual Protections: Incorporating strong confidentiality, non-disclosure, and intellectual property clauses in all contracts with employees, contractors, athletes, and third-party vendors.

How Tangibly Helps Athletic Departments

Tangibly is specifically designed to empower athletic departments to manage and protect their trade secrets without impeding their dynamic operations.

Education: We provide tailored trade secret literacy programs designed for the unique environment of collegiate sports, educating staff and student-athletes on their legal obligations and best practices.

Identification: We collaborate with departments to systematically map and classify high-value information, ensuring precise identification of assets requiring protection.

Management: Our intuitive platform facilitates the documentation, monitoring, and ongoing management of your trade secrets, treating them as the critical assets they legally are.

Protecting trade secrets, while seemingly complex at first, can be streamlined and effective with intentionality and the right tools.

Take the First Step

In this new era of college sports, every competitive advantage is paramount. Ensure your institution is adequately protecting its most valuable intellectual assets.

Contact Tangibly today to schedule a consultation. We will assist you in developing a robust plan to secure your proprietary information, safeguarding it from potential misappropriation, and ensuring your continued competitive edge.

Raul Sheen is a former collegiate track‑and‑field coach who transitioned into SaaS sales and operations. Since August 2023 he’s been Head of Business Operations at Tangibly, where he drives strategic planning, customer engagement and revenue growth. Say hello on LinkedIn

 

 

Related Articles

Blog

The Hidden Half: How Shadow IT and Lean Function Complete Your Trade Secret Protection Strategy

When cybersecurity professionals discuss trade secret protection, the conversation typically centers on zero trust architecture, access controls, and the principle of...
Blog

AI is eating your IP

Original Article in IAM Saturday Opinion on June 14, 2025: “AI Is Eating Your IP” Precis: Saturday Opinion: With the aid of Gemini, Tangibly’s Chris Buntel and Tim...
Blog, Guest Author Series

Behind The Curtain: Trade Secret Protection and Theft In Sports

Summary While everyone focuses on the action on the field, the data that makes this action possible is often overlooked. As this data becomes more valuable, it has also...
Blog

Is AI the ultimate defensive publication author?

Defensive publication is a patent strategy that makes it difficult or impossible for competitors to patent on or near what a company is commercializing.  The basic idea...
Blog

Takeaways: AI is Eating Your Intellectual Property (IP)

Overview In the latest IAM Saturday Opinion, Tangibly’s Chris Buntel and Tim Londergan explore how artificial intelligence is transforming the foundation of...
Blog, Guest Author Series

The New Face of IP in the AI Age: Why Trade Secrets Matter More Than Ever for Tech [Part 1 of 2]

Imagine this: A consultant starts a competing company after taking your proprietary information while under a confidentiality agreement. You promptly file a trade...
Blog

There’s No Trade Secret Troll Hiding Under The Bridge

Imagine this: A consultant starts a competing company after taking your proprietary information while under a confidentiality agreement. You promptly file a trade...
Stealing Confidential Information is Not Necessarily Trade Secret Misappropriation
Blog, Guest Author Series

Stealing Confidential Information is Not Necessarily Trade Secret Misappropriation

Imagine this: A consultant starts a competing company after taking your proprietary information while under a confidentiality agreement. You promptly file a trade...
Blog

Caffeinated or Not, Intent Matters: The Real Cost of Trade Secret Theft

Federal DTSA and Massachusetts UTSA do not clearly define what “willful and malicious” means. Recent litigation in Massachusetts took great steps towards clarifying...
Blog

KPM Analytics Wins $10M Trade Secret Case: What It Means for Foodtech and IP Protection

A recent federal court ruling awarded over $10 million in damages to KPM Analytics, a scientific instrumentation company serving the food and agriculture sectors, in a...