a

Discover

Leverage AI to reveal, enhance, and protect trade secrets.

Manage

Everything you need to run a trade secret program.

Professional Services

Expert guidance to build a trade secret program and secure key IP assets.

FAQs

Answers to your common questions

Blog

Insights and updates on industry trends

Press

Media coverage featuring Tangibly

Podcast

The Reasonable Measures Podcast

Webinars

Presentations exploring strategic insights

Case Law Reviews

Significant trade secret cases

Knowledge Base

Release notes and other Tangibly guides

Case Study

Industry-specific applications

TS25

International Standards for Trade Secret Management

USA Gets Even More Serious About Punishing Trade Secret Theft

Last updated on: May 8, 2023

On this page

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner css=”%7B%22default%22%3A%7B%22margin-bottom%22%3A%221rem%22%7D%7D”][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]The United States federal government keeps ratcheting up its seriousness around protecting American trade secrets.

The previous major shot across the bow of potential trade secret theft was 2016’s Defend Trade Secret Act (“DTSA”).  The DTSA provided a federal cause of action for theft of trade secrets.  Plaintiffs can seek remedies such as injunctions, damages, attorneys’ fees, and even seizure orders under DTSA.  Before the DTSA, trade secret owners had to rely on inconsistent state laws for protection.

In January 2023, President Biden enacted the “Protecting American Intellectual Property Act of 2022” (“PAIPA”).  This represents the next evolution of deterrence, and a sign of trade secrets’ growing importance to the nation.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][us_image image=”297″ align=”center”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text]The President must annually notify Congress of a list of any “foreign person” that has engaged in, supported, or benefited from theft of trade secrets from “United States persons” (individuals or businesses) which could be a significant threat to the national security, foreign policy, economic health, or financial stability of the United States.  The President is also required to report on which entities and people benefited from the trade secret theft, and how they did so.

The PAIPA further requires that the President issue sanctions from a long list including blocking visas, preventing loans, prohibiting contracts with the US government, and other economic restrictions and penalties.

There are a number of procedural open questions that will have to be resolved fairly soon.  It is currently unclear when and how someone named on the list can challenge their inclusion if they believe it to be incorrect.  It is also unclear how a trade secret owner can suggest inclusion of an alleged misappropriator onto the President’s list.  These open questions will likely be addressed in regulations or in litigation.

PAIPA represents the latest arrow added to the quiver protecting American trade secrets.  Trade secret holders have multiple ways to strike back – state court actions, DTSA, ITC Section 337 investigations, and now PAIPA to keep their secrets safe.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Related Articles

Blog

Is AI the ultimate defensive publication author?

Defensive publication is a patent strategy that makes it difficult or impossible for competitors to patent on or near what a company is commercializing.  The basic idea...
Blog

Takeaways: AI is Eating Your Intellectual Property (IP)

Overview In the latest IAM Saturday Opinion, Tangibly’s Chris Buntel and Tim Londergan explore how artificial intelligence is transforming the foundation of...
Blog, Guest Author Series

The New Face of IP in the AI Age: Why Trade Secrets Matter More Than Ever for Tech [Part 1 of 2]

Imagine this: A consultant starts a competing company after taking your proprietary information while under a confidentiality agreement. You promptly file a trade...
Blog

There’s No Trade Secret Troll Hiding Under The Bridge

Imagine this: A consultant starts a competing company after taking your proprietary information while under a confidentiality agreement. You promptly file a trade...
Stealing Confidential Information is Not Necessarily Trade Secret Misappropriation
Blog, Guest Author Series

Stealing Confidential Information is Not Necessarily Trade Secret Misappropriation

Imagine this: A consultant starts a competing company after taking your proprietary information while under a confidentiality agreement. You promptly file a trade...
Blog

Caffeinated or Not, Intent Matters: The Real Cost of Trade Secret Theft

Federal DTSA and Massachusetts UTSA do not clearly define what “willful and malicious” means. Recent litigation in Massachusetts took great steps towards clarifying...
Blog

KPM Analytics Wins $10M Trade Secret Case: What It Means for Foodtech and IP Protection

A recent federal court ruling awarded over $10 million in damages to KPM Analytics, a scientific instrumentation company serving the food and agriculture sectors, in a...
TS25.org
Blog

Introducing Trade Secret 2025 (TS25): The Future of Trade Secret Management

Tangibly, the leading trade secret management platform, proudly announces the launch of Trade Secret 2025 (TS25)—a cutting-edge digital resource designed to...
KPM Analytics v. Blue Sun Scientific
Blog

Palantir is Suing a Y Combinator Startup Over Trade Secrets

Palantir has filed a trade secret lawsuit against Guardian AI, a healthcare-focused AI startup launched by two of its former employees, in what is shaping up to be one...
Blog

Rippling v. Deel: Outsource your HR, but not your trade secrets.

Rippling sued their arch-competitor Deel in the Northern District Court of California on March 17, 2025. Rippling claims that Deel used a “mole” within Rippling to...