Spear Marketing, Inc. v. BancorpSouth Bank

Last updated on: June 13, 2024
By: Tangibly

On this page

In the 2016 appeal case Spear Marketing, Inc. v. BancorpSouth
Bank, the litigation centered on Spear Marketing, Inc. (SMI)
accusing BancorpSouth Bank and Argo Data Resource Corp. of
misappropriating trade secrets related to its VaultWorks
software to create a competing product, Cash Inventory
Optimization (CIO). The case was initially brought to the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, alleging
trade secret theft. Despite attempts to amend claims to sidestep
copyright preemption issues, the focus remained on the trade
secret theft, leading to a summary judgment for the defendants
due to SMI’s lack of evidence. The United States Court of
Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld a nearly $1 million attorneys’
fees award to the defendants, emphasizing the case’s
significance in the realm of copyright preemption and trade
secret litigation. This decision is an appeal from the district
court.

Related Articles

Blog, Case Law & Industry Trends, Featured Blogs

Guarding the Edge: Why Trade Secret Protection Matters in the New NIL Era

Executive Summary The landscape of college athletics is undergoing a profound transformation. With the recent House v. NCAA settlement and the continued prominence of...
Blog, Case Law & Industry Trends, Trade Secret Strategy

Caffeinated or Not, Intent Matters: The Real Cost of Trade Secret Theft

Federal DTSA and Massachusetts UTSA do not clearly define what “willful and malicious” means. Recent litigation in Massachusetts took great steps towards clarifying...
Blog, Case Law & Industry Trends

KPM Analytics Wins $10M Trade Secret Case: What It Means for Foodtech and IP Protection

A recent federal court ruling awarded over $10 million in damages to KPM Analytics, a scientific instrumentation company serving the food and agriculture sectors, in a...
Blog, Case Law & Industry Trends

Palantir is Suing a Y Combinator Startup Over Trade Secrets

Palantir has filed a trade secret lawsuit against Guardian AI, a healthcare-focused AI startup launched by two of its former employees, in what is shaping up to be one...
Blog, Case Law & Industry Trends

Rippling v. Deel: Outsource your HR, but not your trade secrets.

Rippling sued their arch-competitor Deel in the Northern District Court of California on March 17, 2025. Rippling claims that Deel used a “mole” within Rippling to...
Blog, Case Law & Industry Trends, Featured Blogs

DeepSeek Data Security: Safeguarding Your Confidential Information

The Chinese DeepSeek R1 and Janus open-source models are certainly all the AI rage this week. The R1 model was built for a cost of about 5% of what its competitors...
Intro to Trade Secrets, Case Law & Industry Trends

What’s the difference between a patent and trade secret?

What’s the difference between a patent and a trade secret? Patents and trade secrets are both tools for protecting intellectual property, but they operate in...
Blog, Case Law & Industry Trends, Trade Secret Strategy

When a suitor becomes your competitor

Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) due diligence always involves the sharing of confidential information and trade secrets. There’s almost always a non-disclosure...
Blog, Case Law & Industry Trends

Trade secrets, perfume, and pop stars: Inside Revlon’s Britney Spears lawsuit

Ah, the sweet smell of trade secrets in perfumes… Every company in the world has trade secrets whether they know (or smell?) it or not.

Case Law & Industry Trends, Case Law Reviews, Chemicals

ChromaDex, Inc. v. Elysium Health, Inc.

The case is significant for its interpretation of the economic loss rule, requirements for alleging fraudulent deceit and misappropriation of trade secrets, and the...