Disputes

Proactive Protection

Insights

About

Contact

Disputes

Case Validation
AI intelligence to assess case strength and likely outcome.

Damages prediction
Quantify potential damages with evidence backed estimates.

Litigation Funding
Non recourse capital to pursue strong trade secret claims.

Enforce your rights
When theft occurs, Tangibly delivers the proof, funding, and expertise to recover what is yours.

Insights

Reasonable Measures Podcast
Expert conversations on trade secrets, IP strategy, and the disputes shaping modern innovation.

Customer Stories
How companies use Tangibly to protect critical know how and pursue enforcement.

Sign up for The Tangibly Brief
Expert insights on trade secret protection and enforcement, delivered to your inbox.

About

Company
About Tangibly, our leadership, and career opportunities.

Newsroom
Press, announcements, and company updates.

Sim IP x Tangibly Litigation Financing Partnership
Learn more about how Tangibly and SIM IP are making trade secret enforcement more accessible for innovators.

How do you like them apples?

by Chris Buntel | Dec 4, 2023 | Blog, Trade Secret Strategy

The latest in our “trade secrets are everywhere” mantra…

Soon after we wrote about trade secrets in liquor production, we have a widely-reported trade secret misappropriation incident between beer & cider manufacturers.

A manager of IT, sales, and business analysis for Boston Beer Co. (maker of Sam Adams and Angry Orchard) voluntarily left the company in April 2023 to join Downeast Cider House as Senior VP of Marketing.

Boston Beer warned him that joining Downeast Cider would violate his employment agreement. They also notified the founder of Downeast Cider that if they hire the individual, he will be in breach of his pre-existing employment agreement.

Just before leaving, our intrepid IT manager connected an external device to his company computer and accessed files including market plans, sales performance, pricing guides, budgets, and branding documents.

Boston Beer sued both the individual and Downeast in October 2023 for a long laundry list of causes including: breach of non-compete, non-disclosure, a training repayment clause, intentional interference with contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment. Boston Beer also asked for a preliminary injunction preventing the individual from working for Downeast for one year and to not disclose Boston Beer’s confidential information.

Interestingly the complaint was not filed in federal court under DTSA, but instead was filed in Massachusetts state courts under UTSA. This litigation is just getting up to speed, and will be interesting watch while enjoying the hard cider of your choice…

Read the complaint here: https://www.universalhub.com/files/bostonbeer2-complaint.pdf

Last Updated:June, 2026

Table Of Content

Sign up for The Tangibly Brief

Expert insights on trade secret protection and enforcement, delivered to your inbox.